FDA Tweaks Q-Sub Meeting Guidance

The revised guidance document clarifies the Q-submission meeting process, alternate ways sponsors may obtain FDA feedback, and more.

fda business
• Source: Shutterstock

A full revision of the US Food and Drug Administration’s Q-submission (Q-Sub) guidance document, which details how manufacturers may request meetings with the agency, is coming. But while that is in the works, the agency has issued a new version of the 2019 final guidance that attempts to clarify a range of issues.

The FDA promised as part of last year’s Medical Device User Fee Amendments (MDUFA V) package that it would issue a revised draft Q-Sub guidance that included information on when...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Guidance

Global Medtech Guidance Tracker: April 2025

 
• By 

Stay current on regulatory guidelines from around the world with Medtech Insight's Guidance Tracker. 25 documents have been posted on the tracker since its last update.

New Guidance From Canada’s HTA Agency On Submission Of AI-Driven Evidence

 

Recognizing that the evidence it receives in applications for health technology assessments will increasingly be informed by artificial intelligence, the CDA-AMC has clarified its expectations for companies that use AI methods in the generation and/or reporting of evidence.

‘The FDA Will Be Looking For Avenues To Regulate Laboratory Developed Tests’

 

The FDA's final LDT ruling was struck down in federal court last month. For now, diagnostic companies can commercialize under CLIA regulations or apply for FDA approval. McDermott and Tribun Health have shared insights on the risks, pros and cons of both regulatory routes.

Guidance Feedback Highlights Outstanding Questions In AI Development

 
• By 

Many of the hundred-plus commenters to the FDA's draft guidance on AI in medical product regulation said the document was a good start but needed additional clarity and more concrete examples. Stakeholders recommended the inclusion of case studies, metrics, and clearer guidelines to enhance the utility of the guidance, which is seen as a vital step for AI integration in healthcare.

More from Compliance

Don’t Sleep On Inspections: Experts Warn FDA Maintains Enforcement Resources

 

Manufacturers of medical products would be foolish to think that recent upheavals at the US FDA will result in a lack of inspections in the coming years. A panel of experts discussed the current state of inspections during a webinar hosted by the Food and Drug Law Institute.

Global Medtech Guidance Tracker: April 2025

 
• By 

Stay current on regulatory guidelines from around the world with Medtech Insight's Guidance Tracker. 25 documents have been posted on the tracker since its last update.

New Guidance From Canada’s HTA Agency On Submission Of AI-Driven Evidence

 

Recognizing that the evidence it receives in applications for health technology assessments will increasingly be informed by artificial intelligence, the CDA-AMC has clarified its expectations for companies that use AI methods in the generation and/or reporting of evidence.