1. Medtech Insight
  2. >>Policy & Regulation
  3. >>Compliance
  4. >>Guidance

Morcellation Containment System Guidance Stresses Leak Detection, Prevention

 
• By Elizabeth Orr

A new US FDA draft guidance explains what the agency wants to see in submissions for the devices, which are used to contain potentially cancerous tissue during laparoscopic surgery. Strength, permeability and leakage testing are all key considerations.

Sign outside of FDA's headquarters in White Oak, MD
• Source: Alamy

New draft guidance from the US Food and Drug Administration lays bare the types of non-clinical testing the agency hopes to see in support of premarket submissions for gynecologic and general laparoscopic power morcellation containment systems.

The systems are used during laparoscopic power morcellation procedures, particularly gynecological procedures such as hysterectomy or the removal of uterine fibroids

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Guidance

Global Medtech Guidance Tracker: April 2025

 
• By Vibha Sharma

Stay current on regulatory guidelines from around the world with Medtech Insight's Guidance Tracker. 25 documents have been posted on the tracker since its last update.

New Guidance From Canada’s HTA Agency On Submission Of AI-Driven Evidence

 
• By Neena Brizmohun

Recognizing that the evidence it receives in applications for health technology assessments will increasingly be informed by artificial intelligence, the CDA-AMC has clarified its expectations for companies that use AI methods in the generation and/or reporting of evidence.

‘The FDA Will Be Looking For Avenues To Regulate Laboratory Developed Tests’

 
• By Natasha Barrow

The FDA's final LDT ruling was struck down in federal court last month. For now, diagnostic companies can commercialize under CLIA regulations or apply for FDA approval. McDermott and Tribun Health have shared insights on the risks, pros and cons of both regulatory routes.

Guidance Feedback Highlights Outstanding Questions In AI Development

 
• By Elizabeth Orr

Many of the hundred-plus commenters to the FDA's draft guidance on AI in medical product regulation said the document was a good start but needed additional clarity and more concrete examples. Stakeholders recommended the inclusion of case studies, metrics, and clearer guidelines to enhance the utility of the guidance, which is seen as a vital step for AI integration in healthcare.

More from Compliance

New Guidance From Canada’s HTA Agency On Submission Of AI-Driven Evidence

 
• By Neena Brizmohun

Recognizing that the evidence it receives in applications for health technology assessments will increasingly be informed by artificial intelligence, the CDA-AMC has clarified its expectations for companies that use AI methods in the generation and/or reporting of evidence.

‘The FDA Will Be Looking For Avenues To Regulate Laboratory Developed Tests’

 
• By Natasha Barrow

The FDA's final LDT ruling was struck down in federal court last month. For now, diagnostic companies can commercialize under CLIA regulations or apply for FDA approval. McDermott and Tribun Health have shared insights on the risks, pros and cons of both regulatory routes.

Congress, Researchers Highlight Security Risks At DNA Testing Services

 
• By Elizabeth Orr

Congress has launched an inquiry into 23andMe amid privacy concerns following its bankruptcy, particularly regarding the potential sale of sensitive user data. Additionally, a Cybernews report gave 40 DNA testing firms an average cybersecurity grade of D, citing widespread vulnerabilities and data breaches, along with inadequate public information about their security practices.