Appeals Court Upholds $300m Mesh Judgement Against Ethicon
Executive Summary
The California court struck down fines levied for communications between sales reps and doctors, but said the bulk of the penalty was justified.
You may also be interested in...
WLF, AdvaMed Ask Supreme Court To Review Pelvic Mesh Litigation
Washington Legal Foundation and Advanced Medical Technology Association filed amicus briefs to urge the Supreme Court to overturn a $300m civil verdict against pelvic mesh manufacturer Ethicon.
Johnson & Johnson Asks Supremes To Take Up Pelvic Mesh Litigation
The firm says that California laws that lead to a $300m jury verdict against subsidiary Ethicon for deceptive marketing of pelvic mesh violate due process standards.
J&J Awaits Verdict In California Pelvic Mesh Trial
An $800m lawsuit filed by the state of California against Johnson & Johnson for alleged fraudulent marketing of pelvic mesh products is in the hands of a state judge after the conclusion of a 10-week trial. This is the first lawsuit brought by a state against a pelvic mesh manufacturer to go to trial.