One-month and one-year results from the ABSORB IV trial did not show a significant difference in efficacy between Abbott Vascular's now-defunct Absorb BVS bioresorbable stent and Abbott's Xience metallic everolimus-eluting stent, but the 30-day and one-year rates of myocardial infarction, device thrombosis, and target-lesion revascularization were worse with Absorb.
Gregg Stone, professor at Columbia University Medical Center, presented findings of the pooled meta-analysis of four randomized trials during a late-breaking session at the Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT) on Sept....
Read the full article – start your free trial today!
Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights
- Start your 7-day free trial
- Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
- Access comprehensive global coverage
- Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Already a subscriber?