1. Medtech Insight
  2. >>Policy & Regulation
  3. >>Legal & IP

Mixed Final Ruling In Nevro, Boston Sci Patent Spat

 
• By Elizabeth Orr

A California federal judge delivered a mixed verdict in a patent dispute between Nevro Corp. and Boston Scientific. The court said that some of Nevro's claims were patent-eligible, but further ruled that Boston Scientific had not infringed those patents.

Gavel_1200x675

A California court has delivered a mixed verdict in a patent dispute between Nevro Corp. and Boston Scientific Corp., upholding some of Nevro’s key patent claims even while ruling that Boston Scientific hadn’t infringed the patents in question.

Nevro’s patents cover technology used in nerve-stimulation devices for pain that the company says delivers a therapeutic effect without causing the tingling or discomfort associated with most nerve stimulation.In a July 24 ruling, Judge Vince Chhabria of the US District Court for Northern California determined that six claims across three Nevro patents were valid

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required
Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber?

More from Legal & IP

State And International Enforcement Agencies May Step Up Amid Uncertain Federal Environment

 
• By Elizabeth Orr

States and international regulatory bodies may increase their US enforcement role following federal staff cuts, Hyman Phelps & McNamara attorneys said in a recent webinar. The attorneys also expect False Claims Act enforcement and public health to remain key areas of focus at the federal level.

FDA And Boston Scientific Face Legal Action Over Spinal Device Safety

 
• By Elizabeth Orr

A patient, Dena Lawler, is suing Boston Scientific and the US FDA over alleged harm from a spinal stimulator device. Lawler claims inadequate regulatory review allowed dangerous modifications to the device, which then caused her pain and other health issues. She is calling for reconsideration of the device approvals.

California Medtech Firms Resolve Patent Dispute Over Delivery Catheters

 
• By Brian Bossetta

Route 92 says it has reached a settlement with Q’Apel Medical over patent claims concerning its Tenzing delivery catheters.

US Medtech Tariffs: How Will EU Navigate Unchartered Territory?

 
• By Amanda Maxwell

US President Trump has imposed sweeping tariffs that encompass medtech. These are expected to drive up costs, disrupt supply chains and hinder innovation, likely driving the EU to seek new trade partnerships to mitigate the impact.

More from Policy & Regulation

Debate On FDA User Fee Reauthorization Begins To Take Shape

 
• By Elizabeth Orr

A battle may be forming over the 2027 FDA user fee reauthorizations. At a conference Friday, Democratic Rep. Jake Auchincloss supports them for their effectiveness, while Deputy FDA Commissioner Grace Graham echoed criticisms from HHS Sec. Kennedy, among others, in calling for reform to ensure public trust.

Health Secretary Defends Spending Cuts During Senate Hearing On HHS Budget

 
• By Elizabeth Orr

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. emphasized administrative cost reductions and defended budget decisions during a Senate hearing on HHS funding. Some senators, however, expressed concerns over the impacts spending cuts had on essential health programs.

Tariffs Threaten Medtech Innovation And US Position As World Leader, Whitaker Tells Lawmakers

 
• By Brian Bossetta

During his testimony before US senators on the impact of tariffs on critical supply chains, AdvaMed’s Scott Whitaker said the Trump tariffs could jeopardize America’s preeminence in medtech. Other industry experts echoed similar concerns.