Device Investors Showing Some Spine

This clearly isn’t the go-go period of spine in the mid 2000s, but venture capitalists can’t ignore the enormous opportunities for companies able to treat low back pain. Elsevier’s Strategic Transactions shows that just in the last year, 26 spine or low back pain companies received private funding. To be sure, many were small rounds, some were funded with debt, and some were insider rounds trying to keep companies moving forward, but venture investors showed excitement by investing in large rounds for a select number of start-ups.

The age of spine – roughly 2003 to 2007 – was a heady time for venture investors and spine entrepreneurs. Everyone involved knew the sector was getting too much attention from investors, but in their investment mind’s eyes the other 300 or so spine start-ups would be the ones to pay the price. As things turned out, when the reality cops came to bust up the party few escaped unscathed. The first pressure came from insurers who began requiring more clinical proof that spine devices could improve care without overinflating costs. Then, the recession drained the capital pool causing several high profile start-ups to simply run out of funds.

Today, VCs profess to getting a chill down their spine at the mere mention of a spine deal. In truth, however, things aren’t so bad.

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Archive

Final Chance To Have Your Say: Take Our Reader Survey This Week

 
• By 

Editor’s note: This is your final call to participate in the survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. The deadline is 20 September.

Shape Our Content: Take The Reader Survey

 
• By 

Editor’s note: We are conducting a survey to better understand our subscribers’ content and delivery needs. If there are any changes you’d like to see in coverage topics, content format or the method in which you receive and access Medtech Insight, or if you love it how it is, now is the time to have your voice heard.

Patients With Movement Disorders Will Benefit From Medtronic’s Expanded MRI Labeling For DBS

 
• By 

Medtronic announced it received expanded MRI labeling for its DBS systems, which is critical, given that almost 70% of all DBS-eligible patients will likely need an MRI at some point in their care, says Ashwini Sharan, CMO for Medtronic Neuromodulation.

Podcast: Lung Life AI CEO Shares Regulatory And Reimbursement Journey For Lung Cancer Diagnostic

 

In this episode, Medtech Insight reporter Natasha Barrow speaks to LungLife AI CEO Paul Pagano. Lung Life AI is a US-based AIM-listed medical technology company that has developed a liquid biopsy test for the early detection of lung cancer called Lung LB. Pagano runs through the highlights of Lung Life AI journey to date and its future ambition for a strategic partnership. He also provides advice to similar diagnostic companies seeking reimbursement andcompliance with the US FDA Lab Developed Test ruling.

More from Medtech Insight

Swiss Medtechs Advised To Work On US Tariff Mitigation Strategies

 
• By 

The US’ 90-day suspension of higher “reciprocal tariffs” will expire on 9 July, raising fears that the 31% tariff rate on Swiss medtech and other goods exported to the US might make a comeback. While the tariff situation changes on an almost daily basis, medtechs should forearm for any eventually, say local business organizations.

Guardant Health Launches Germline Hereditary Cancer Test

 

Guardant Health introduces a new germline panel test to help guide cancer treatment, assess the risk of secondary cancers in patients and identify family members at risk of cancer.

FDLI: Clinical Labs Face Uncertainty After Texas Court’s LDT Ruling

 
• By 

A Texas court's decision against US FDA regulation of lab-developed tests (LDTs) has introduced new uncertainties for clinical labs. Industry stakeholders are now worried about potential future regulations while also managing existing compliance requirements. Recent conference discussions underscored the complexities of FDA oversight.