The Rebirth of Dermagraft
This article was originally published in Start Up
Executive Summary
Dermagraft is often mentioned as an example of a failure in tissue engineering, illustrating the difficulty of achieving return on investment in this field. The product was only a market failure, however; clinicians say that it worked to heal difficult wounds, and that it was just a product ahead of its time. Now small company Advanced BioHealing has given new life to the bioengineered dermal substitute, abandoned by Smith & Nephew, by supporting it with the focus, and the unique marketing and manufacturing skills that tissue-engineered products require. In the process, it believes it has created assets and skill-sets from which other tissue-engineering start-ups might benefit.
You may also be interested in...
Market Intel: Intense Competition, Innovation Drive Healing Trends In Wound Care
The global advanced wound-care market is expected to reach $10.4bn by 2020, driven by massive competition, and forcing companies to innovate constantly to address the rising prevalence of chronic wound injuries, diabetic foot ulcers and burns. While regulatory and reimbursement challenges prevail, opportunities in this highly segmented market, in particular, in the advanced wound-dressings sector, are vast, with double-digit revenue growth potential.
Reapplix APS
When the healing process for chronic wounds like diabetic foot ulcers stalls, something must be done to prevent infection and amputation. Out of Denmark, Reapplix APS has a bedside device for creating a three-layered biological patch out of a patient's own blood, without additives, and within 20 minutes.
Biologics: The Growth Engine In Advanced Wound Care
With estimated revenues in excess of $5 billion per year worldwide, the advanced wound care market has garnered the attention of both major companies and investors for its tremendous potential. Growth in this market is being driven by the development of new bioactive products that can successfully heal chronic wounds such as diabetic foot ulcers, which are among the most challenging and costly to treat. This article is reprinted from the June issue of Medtech Insight.