Direct-to-Consumer Surgery: Non-invasive liposuction for the masses

Not so very long ago, reimbursement was king in the world of medical devices. But the overnight success of injectible anti-wrinkle drug Botox signalled a change in the market. Now device companies developing liposuction alternatives hope to repeat that success, perhaps most importantly, in building their businesses outside of traditional reimbursement circles with a largely consumer-driven or self-pay market with new devices for cosmetic surgery applications.

Not so very long ago, reimbursement was king in the world of medical devices. Without reimbursement, there was no market, particularly for devices that had any degree of invasiveness to them. For that reason, if companies with surgical or even minimally invasive devices dreamed of one day selling to the virtually unlimited consumer market, they took the high road to the marketplace, by targeting a dire, and reimbursable, medical need first. Thus, Allergan Inc. , which had a multi-focal lens that could help the middle aged see both near and far without reading glasses, positioned its implantable device for the cataract market. Medtronic Inc. , looking into the market for obesity devices, got its electrical stimulation device approved for gastroparesis, an uncommon but horrendous disorder that causes frequent vomiting. (See "Obesity: Supersized Medical Device Market Also see "Obesity: Super-Sized Medical Device Market " - Medtech Insight, 1 March, 2003.) And injectable anti-wrinkle drug Botox (botulinum toxin) first entered the market as a therapy for a rare facial twitching disorder. But things are changing, and it was perhaps the overnight success of Botox that first signaled this shift.

Botox has boomed since its introduction in 2000; there were 1.6 million Botox injections in 2002, up 4% over the previous year, even when the economy was in a recession....

More from Policy & Regulation

Swiss Medtechs Advised To Work On US Tariff Mitigation Strategies

 
• By 

The US’ 90-day suspension of higher “reciprocal tariffs” will expire on 9 July, raising fears that the 31% tariff rate on Swiss medtech and other goods exported to the US might make a comeback. While the tariff situation changes on an almost daily basis, medtechs should forearm for any eventually, say local business organizations.

FDLI: Clinical Labs Face Uncertainty After Texas Court’s LDT Ruling

 
• By 

A Texas court's decision against US FDA regulation of lab-developed tests (LDTs) has introduced new uncertainties for clinical labs. Industry stakeholders are now worried about potential future regulations while also managing existing compliance requirements. Recent conference discussions underscored the complexities of FDA oversight.

Inclusive By Design: UK Invites Sponsors To Submit Trial Diversity Plans

 
• By 

The UK has issued clearer guidance to help drug and medical device sponsors demonstrate how they intend to include a diverse and relevant range of participants in their clinical trials.

Plans For Specific EU Orphan And Pediatric Device Expert Panel Need To Go Further

 

Moves are at last underway for a more specific focus on orphan and pediatric devices. They are a start; but experts are calling for more to support this sector.

More from Medtech Insight

Edwards Lifesciences Holds 2025 EPS Outlook Despite Tariff Headwind

 
• By 

The brunt of the tariff exposure stems from Singapore and Costa Rica, which together account for an estimated 70% to 80% of the tariff-related cost burden. Less than 10% of the exposure is tied to China.

Data Finds Capillary Blood Is A Reliable Alternative To Venous Blood For Routine Testing

 

A study from Babson Diagnostics published in the peer-reviewed Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine showed that capillary blood sample volume issues can overcome historical challenges, such as poor quality, through a technique called assay miniaturization.

Inclusive By Design: UK Invites Sponsors To Submit Trial Diversity Plans

 
• By 

The UK has issued clearer guidance to help drug and medical device sponsors demonstrate how they intend to include a diverse and relevant range of participants in their clinical trials.