Photos Snapped During FDA Device Inspections: Fair Game Or Agency Overreach?

FDA says it has the authority to take photographs during facility inspections, citing decades-old non-medical-device-related legal cases as evidence – including Dow Chemical Co. v. US – but industry lawyer Robert Klepinski says FDA's reliance on the Dow case as a defense for snapping pictures doesn't pass muster. "The agency always cites the Dow Chemical case, wherein the EPA flew over [Dow's plant] with a helicopter or airplane and took pictures," Klepinski said, noting that "it’s absolutely ludicrous, a stupid case to cite" because FDA investigators don't inspect device firms from the air. Meanwhile, the agency doesn't have a policy in place that addresses investigators' personal cameras, such as phone cameras, which throws into question whether photos could unintentionally – or intentionally – fall into third-party hands. Also, device-maker Cynosure's VP of regulatory affairs, Connie Hoy, talks about how her company handles photo requests made by investigators.

"We believe it’s our right to [take photos]. We believe it’s an inspection tool, much like other tools that we use, like the computer, for example," FDA National Device Expert and investigator Phil Pontikos said.

The agency's Investigations Operations Manual cites two decades-old cases – 1986's Dow Chemical Co. v. USand 1976's US v. Acri Wholesale...

Read the full article – start your free trial today!

Join thousands of industry professionals who rely on Medtech Insight for daily insights

  • Start your 7-day free trial
  • Explore trusted news, analysis, and insights
  • Access comprehensive global coverage
  • Enjoy instant access – no credit card required

More from Compliance

Industry Execs Talk Tariff Turbulence During MD&M East

 

During MD&M East in Manhattan last week, a panel of experts discussed how the Trump administration’s trade policy is affecting manufacturing and offered some ideas on what manufacturers can do to help mitigate the chaos.

FDA Halts Acceptance Of Chinese Lab Data Due To Accuracy Issues

 
• By 

The FDA has stopped accepting data from two Chinese labs due to accuracy issues. Mid-Link and SDWH have been flagged for potentially falsified results and other misconduct. This decision, which follows months of discussions and warnings, emphasizes the FDA's commitment to ensuring data integrity in medical device submissions.

Inclusive By Design: UK Invites Sponsors To Submit Trial Diversity Plans

 
• By 

The UK has issued clearer guidance to help drug and medical device sponsors demonstrate how they intend to include a diverse and relevant range of participants in their clinical trials.

Medical Devices Not The Focus Of FDA’s Plans To Step Up Foreign Inspections, Expert Says

 

The US FDA recently announced plans to carry out more unannounced inspections of foreign facilities. But those inspections will primarily target drug producers, with less attention and resources allocated to those making devices.

More from Policy & Regulation

Swiss Medtechs Advised To Work On US Tariff Mitigation Strategies

 
• By 

The US’ 90-day suspension of higher “reciprocal tariffs” will expire on 9 July, raising fears that the 31% tariff rate on Swiss medtech and other goods exported to the US might make a comeback. While the tariff situation changes on an almost daily basis, medtechs should forearm for any eventually, say local business organizations.

FDLI: Clinical Labs Face Uncertainty After Texas Court’s LDT Ruling

 
• By 

A Texas court's decision against US FDA regulation of lab-developed tests (LDTs) has introduced new uncertainties for clinical labs. Industry stakeholders are now worried about potential future regulations while also managing existing compliance requirements. Recent conference discussions underscored the complexities of FDA oversight.

Inclusive By Design: UK Invites Sponsors To Submit Trial Diversity Plans

 
• By 

The UK has issued clearer guidance to help drug and medical device sponsors demonstrate how they intend to include a diverse and relevant range of participants in their clinical trials.