Patient, Consumer Groups Press For More Oversight Of Device Iterations
This article was originally published in The Gray Sheet
Patient and consumer groups urged better FDA control over modifications to marketed products and expressed support for agency oversight of laboratory-developed tests at a recent update meeting on device user fee reauthorization.
You may also be interested in...
Senate HELP Ranking Member Sen. Patty Murray in a staff report criticizes FDA and manufacturers for reacting slowly to duodenoscope contamination incidents in 2013. The report says FDA needs a more robust device surveillance system and calls for more attention to 510(k) modification policies. Murray is a key partner in ongoing Senate work to produce a so-called "medical innovation" bill.
A House Subcommittee plans to take up draft legislation at a hearing next month that brings together test kits and lab-developed tests into a new regulatory category. The proposal offers many ways for tests to avoid a “high-risk” classification. “The Gray Sheet” compares the provisions to recent proposals vetted in the Senate.
The agency is taking another stab at clarifying its views on when a 510(k) is needed for a device modification in a draft guidance it hopes to issue next year, after having to abandon its 2011 effort in the face of stakeholder revolt. The device center's Michael Ryan previews what to expect.